This week Barbra Streisand has done one of her own again: the fact that the best way to keep people from talking about you is to keep a low profile isn't quite understood. Come on, what Óscar Puente announced/commented a few days ago that his team is compiling the insults that he is the object of in some media, the minister, not the team, although the same also by extension, and everything was announced /comment and fill the networks with selections of your best. The world and its things are not the same since X and surroundings exist; the hunt against Kate Middleton had already given us proof. We should know, or anyway we already know and that's what we're going for.
Amidst comments of the style "that's what the taxes that should go to health and education" (@pabloharour), "maybe we can put the people that Óscar Puente has counting insults to counting potholes" (@naroh), those who put their hands on their waists to announce that if you don't want broth, two cups, and that they won't shut up, we sense that silence has become synonymous with offending, those who wonder what this data will be used for (" Black lists? Voodoo?", @oscardiazdliano), and those who come out in defense of the minister asking for more cane, let's go.
This is how it should be played on the left, attacking. Not a step back" (@ToroenReposo), praising Ayuso, and the dozens of "fuck him" with their different unrepeatable complements making waves in Puente ("come on, give them their own medicine", @GodoyLapen48994), let's go until again. Even more so if we heed the prediction of @Davitxu70: "In the times we live in, elections are won in the RRSS. Give him strength." Politics as fanaticism.
The week that started with the Easter and Puente bridge as a hashtag ends with a wedding, that of the mayor of Madrid, Martínez-Almeida. We needed something to celebrate, majestic plural, eh. Of course the networks have something to say: will they wish the newlyweds eat aniseeds?
Spoiler: there are none on the menu, thanks to X, very few.
Yes, the B side of humanity manifests itself freely on the networks thanks to a large extent to anonymity, but also to polarization, it is always the other who starts and what's more, they deserve it. Ordinary tweeters are not spared either, many spontaneous people have compiled the insults they themselves receive. It would be necessary to ask if, in addition to receivers, they are also emitters. We only take note of what is there, what a shame.
