In a future change in secondary school content, which should be coming up, it would be useful to include a new subject: preparation for first lady, or gentleman. Its need is self-explanatory after the recent NATO summit in Madrid, in which both the recreational plans of wives and the Armageddon plans of husbands have been discussed. You pair up with someone and show up mounted or mounted on Air Force One, or similar, and see how you do.
At a time when the family has become nuclear, First Marriages are characterized by being expansive: they, and some he, acquire as consorts of first leaders a showy but unwritten role and on which there is not much agreement either, with the risk which implies ending up on paper. We have seen it now, that of paper, not paper, in the photographs on stairs, museums, and tourist visits with which we have promoted the country and they, plus that of Luxembourg, have saved a vacation destination: La Granja, view . The Royal Theater, too. The stylistic duel, analyzed with the same care as the size of nuclear warheads, so to speak.
Among the ladies, different relationships must also be established. By geographical area, as in the Eurovision voting? For political sympathy? For alliances? What to do if you can't stand a specific colleague? And if you are not interested in art or blown glass? Good training should include what to say in those situations where it's so easy to screw up and turn an already stormy summit into a storm. Hillary Clinton described the difficulty of serving as first lady: "Who I really am as a person is ultimately less important to people than what they want me to represent as a person." But what do you want them to represent?
Perhaps the programs for spouses could be eliminated, at least until the photographs are no longer even, not like now, the power in the black and white of male suits, the companions, in color. That the leaders travel alone, which is what we ordinary mortals do.
