the sinking of the ship, and the Soil, the view to be normal, to have come to an end. Among the authors, of this remarkable group of isolated studies, appears to approach very popular. People say: the heating is a ostoppbart of the train, so we might as well accept our fate. In addition to that of the us, the authors, Roy Scranton (SVT 12/6) and Jonathan Franzen (The ... 1/9), it was called, raised by among others Kerstin Ekman (DN 26/5 2018).
But it is not only the author defended the view. Each and every phone call I ended up in the climate of the past few years, ranging from nursery nurses, and lawyers to retirees, people have expressed a resigned feeling that the next storm that is inevitably going to tear anything, regardless of the action.
(that is, in a sense) is that the challenges are too great for the people, for the variance one, warming has already gone too far.
klimatdeterministerna because they have already decided – address, never their own lack of empirical evidence. It can get even worse than they are saying. It could be better. There may be a third-party. To say that there is a predictable evolution of the celestial body is just as reasonable to believe that an almighty spagettimonster at a particular point in time to proclaim the day of Judgment, or that Elon Musk is Jesus christ. The idea of the planetary laws is a fear that people are put off at the same time, we are looking into it.
If it's anything like the 1900s and the early 2000's thinking has been learned, it's that the world is a confusing one, full of surprises. Yes, a complex one, as it is called. We are in a climatic context have to do with the whole of the biophysical earth system and human society. We simply do not know how to do it. Climate scientists don't know. The poets do not know. Oljebaronerna and äppelmustarna don't know. No one will know. The scientists have in their models, which are, at best, useful idiots. Don't get me wrong. Computer simulation as a tool is essential. However, they carry out the sannolikhetskalkyler. , How to jet, and känsloströmmar will affect the future of communities and how communities affect the jet, and the känsloströmmarna, don't even know their machines.
when constructing a trade-off between acceptance and continue to fight for change. I don't know where this obsessive-compulsive approach to choose between two things that are actually going to be home at the same time, it will, however, likely stems from the misantropi, or sadness, or grinighet.
If we are going to listen to scientists who warns of the klimatupphettningen and utarmandet of biodiversity, as they say, yes, the situation is serious, but no, it's not too late yet, there are things to be done. As the sole writer, with expertise in the field of humanities, then, proclaim in the ears of all the action of the futility bears witness to a rare and self-absorption. You know, Scranton, and Franzen, and the Book of science did I miss?
as Of the experts on the world's global environmental problems can see a possible way forward, what is the logic to only listen to their warnings?
klimatdeterministerna is that they come from a white, western, middle-class. In addition, they, like me, does not of young people. To get the teenagers to kick out the race is over.
hypothesis: it could be the case that those who have the privilege, and are not likely to be affected by the consequences of the välfärdsökningen, it is easier to fly for his resignation?
and Fatalism, it is nothing more than a middle-class luxury? < / span> < / span><