María Patiño is one of Mediaset's most influential collaborators. She has always been known for not keeping quiet at all and saying everything in a very direct way. She has been involved in controversies on several occasions, some of them involving one of her classmates.
And that is what has happened today, Tuesday, April 25. The presenter has sent a very forceful message to one of Sálvame's colleagues, through her social networks, where she complains about her lack of professionalism.
During the program broadcast on Monday, April 24, the journalist Gema López gave the exclusive that the daughter of the Infanta Elena, Victoria Federica, had stepped on a young woman with her horse during the April Fair. She also added that the monarch's niece had gone directly without saying anything to the young woman.
A rather delicate situation for the Royal Family, since the young woman had been transferred to the hospital. A piece of news that was completed with the information that came out an hour later, which clarified that Victoria Federica had apologized to the young woman. Information that Gema López was in charge of denying on the set of Sálvame. ''It's absolutely false, it's been more than 24 hours and he hasn't contacted this girl." She stated.
The news that he gave exclusively on the Telecinco program did not sit well with the presenter María Patiño, who hours later gave his most sincere opinion on his social networks. '' I am outraged, the lack of professionalism talking about the @gemaconga exclusive '', she wrote on her Twitter account. A very direct statement in which she accused her partner of her lack of professionalism.
Patiño's comment has not gone unnoticed in networks and a great controversy has been created around the presenter, since users have not seen well that he said that to Gema López. ''You talking about professionalism'', ''I speak the super professional creature'', ''The frying pan says to the saucepan, ''That you speak precisely about professionalism, it makes me laugh'', ''What do you know about that ?'', were some of the comments against the publication of the collaborator.
