The victim of the abuse of Mónica Oltra's ex-husband appeals the file of the case

The victim of sexual abuse by the ex-husband of the former vice president of the Valencian Government Mónica Oltra in a juvenile center has appealed the provisional file of the case against the former president for alleged concealment, considering that there are facts "of sufficient importance" to continue The instruction.

Oliver Thansan
Oliver Thansan
10 April 2024 Wednesday 22:56
4 Reads
The victim of the abuse of Mónica Oltra's ex-husband appeals the file of the case

The victim of sexual abuse by the ex-husband of the former vice president of the Valencian Government Mónica Oltra in a juvenile center has appealed the provisional file of the case against the former president for alleged concealment, considering that there are facts "of sufficient importance" to continue The instruction.

This is stated in the appeal filed before the Valencia Court against the order of the Investigative Court number 15 that agreed to the provisional dismissal of the proceedings against all those investigated on the understanding that "each and every one of the indications" has "vanished." completely".

The appeal, to which EFE has had access, considers that there has been a "radical and unexplained change in the instructor's criteria, who now does not see a crime where he did before", and no evidence has been provided that allows " "outright rule out" the accusations, beyond the statements of those investigated.

Likewise, he indicates that "it is not understood" that where then there were situations "so inexplicable that they could have no other interpretation than the agreement to conceal the abuses, we now see merely irregular actions," and maintains that they remain "in its integrity" the incriminating evidence.

"The change of opinion of the instructor is very surprising, the best expression of which is found in the reasoned presentation that he addressed to the TSJCV, and which now concludes in the criminal irrelevance of the conduct attributed to those investigated; to all, without discrimination," the appeal indicates. .

The appellant affirms that the investigation must continue to clarify why the then minor was taken to the trial about the sexual abuse suffered handcuffed and guarded by the Police, which is part of a strategy aimed at "first hiding and then discrediting the complaint of the abuses."

For this reason, he asks that agents and an inspector from the National Police, as well as the director and an educator of the juvenile center where the minor under guardianship was held, who were already proposed and rejected, testify as witnesses.

Finally, it demands that the order of the provisional file of the case be annulled and that the continuation of the procedure be ordered to carry out new proceedings and subsequently issue an order for an abbreviated procedure.

The appeal also criticizes the time that the accused have had to "eliminate any trace of incriminating email", which is why the majority of the email accounts used by them "have been deleted and hardly any information has been obtained."

The appealed order states that "it has not been proven, not even at the level of the evidence, that Oltra, nor any other person from the Department, directed any order, instruction, instructions or indication to those investigated" in relation to the case of his ex-husband, Luis Ramírez, in prison for abuse of the minor under the guardianship of the Generalitat Valenciana.