Several days have passed, but the non-wedding of the bullfighter Juan Ortega and his now ex-girlfriend Carmen Otte continues to be a topical topic, since the failed marriage is bringing with it several consequences; among others, that rumors and speculations circulate freely.
Some rumors that from the first day Juan del Val has been in charge of denying, becoming an improvised defender of the bullfighter, of whom he is a friend. The writer was also one of the guests at the wedding along with his wife, Nuria Roca, and last Sunday he wanted to shed a little more light on everything that happened.
The writer appeared like every week in La Roca, and as expected, the topic of Juan Ortega's failed marriage re-emerged. At first, the author of Bocabesada refused to participate in the conversation, but in the end his colleagues urged him to do so. Even his wife, Nuria Roca, asked him to provide some information: "You only deny or confirm," he told her.
However, as soon as his colleagues began to debate the possible existence of a third person as "guilty" of the events, Juan del Val reacted sharply, making his position clear and making it clear that everything was totally unfounded rumors. .
"You may have more or less information, but I love it when you invent something with all your heart. It's brutal," he jumped, unable to remain silent, in the face of the information that his companions were considering. "It is a complete lie and no one has been able to prove it. How can there be third parties?"
The writer maintains his support for the right-hander, as he has done since day one, denying all the rumors that continue to circulate about the possible opinions for Juan Ortega's sudden change of mind, which would have led him to cancel the engagement with his girlfriend in extremis.
What's more, La Roca's collaborators insisted: What if Juan Ortega had hidden from del Val what was really happening? However, it is something that the writer does not contemplate. What's more, he took the opportunity to settle the matter once and for all: "I don't know anything about life, I'm just saying that that's not true."
For the writer, everything that has happened agrees with his friend's way of being. For this reason, he wanted to reflect: "There are realities that we do not know about when doubts arise that, of course, were not from that same morning," he explained, thus providing new data.
"I say that he is a person who does not betray himself in any aspect of life and, therefore, has made an enormously coherent decision," the writer concluded.
