History repeats itself as a tragedy and a farce, and some would like it like tamayazo, a word that the RAE has not incorporated but has incorporated into political language, recalling that vote in which two elected PSOE parliamentarians (Tamayo and Sáez) changed their vote and they prevented their co-religionist Simancas from obtaining the presidency of the Community of Madrid. It was all about mentioning Vox to "some good socialists" and Tamayo came to mind on the networks, how bad.
Twitter was divided between those who thought that Vox spokesman Espinosa de los Monteros was calling for the let's say defection to socialists little or not at all happy with the Sánchez line, showing that adjectives are like the shadow, it depends on which side do you put on so that he takes you: "good" for whom? Meanwhile, others were leaning towards Espinosa's later explanation, which was sarcasm, because "there is no good PSOE", and a third current is leaning towards considering the voxera occurrence a pulla against Feijóo, who in his search for the lost ballot box is knocking on all the doors, to the point that @Doc_Hannibal confesses: "I live with the fear of answering an unknown number and let it be Feijóo pidiéndome formar gobierno".
The restlessness made its way among some tweeters, such as @ciudadanopirata, who says that he hopes that "all those elected are trustworthy people". Well, they are politicians, that is, human beings, don't think badly and let's leave it at that, although, just in case, @ctxt_es proposes "that the UN send blue helmets and the EU international observers to monitor the voting of the session of investiture". Surely this is an irony.
And a tamayazo in reverse, eh? @JesusSoria wonders: "Can you imagine what Sumar would ask PP deputies . The summer will be very long and adjectives are loaded by the devil, just like nouns. Is there a good PSOE? Is there a good PP? Is there anyone else who doesn't have an opinion? Because from Benidorm, the summer capital that no one disputes, Massiel has asked that the two majority parties agree "for once". You can ask for finer, but not clearer.
One, which is very filmic, recalls that scene in Some Good Men in which the good lawyers, as we summarize it, enter the courtroom and the audience roars when they see a Tom Cruise in full uniform. But Cruise is not an MP.
