Luis Miguel has been one of the leading figures in the Spanish-speaking music industry in recent months. The one known as Sol de México was questioned both about his physical appearance and his state of health at the start of his tour of South America. Rumors about the use of a double and complaints about his voice filled social networks in Argentina and Chile, but it is not the only place where the renowned singer is not seen in the most positive light.
As Semana magazine has learned, his ex-partner Aracely Arámbula has reported that the artist does not pay support for his daughters. In his own words, she has defined him as a “alimony debtor.” Likewise, he has taken advantage of his criticism to send a message to Paloma Cuevas, in particular due to the fact that he spends more time and lives with his daughters than with his own. Some statements that continue the exchange of accusations between the two.
“My door has always been open, I don't have to be there. He has to be closer to them, I am the mother. Like all fathers, just because he is an idol doesn't mean you can't be a dad. See Alejandro Fernández, with his children on stage, with his granddaughter; Chayanne, people who have cared for me with a lot of affection, with a lot of heart, who have cared for my children, who my children have affection for and admiration for them,” he expressed in a parade.
“And how is it possible that they have a father who is an idol, how good, what a father. I have always told my children 'admire your dad a lot because your dad is a great artist', but I hope that this great artist is also a great father for them. “Not with me, for them,” he added to his words. Afterwards, he accused Luis Miguel of not contributing the necessary amount to feed his children since 2019, about four years unpaid.
“He is a food debtor, details are missing, but I am calm with my life. I work a lot and I don't need anything to support them. It is a responsibility, an obligation and a right of my children,” she said. Next, he shouted to the heavens about the differences in treatment with Paloma Cuevas' family: “The children are not to blame, but they should take care of their own. There is no communication with Paloma. "She hasn't spoken to me."
Arámbula concluded by interpreting conversations that he had had with the minors as a result of this situation: “My children did say 'Why did my father go to pick up this lady's daughters?', I told them 'Well, look, they are the daughters of this woman.' our friends, they are not to blame for anything.' They didn't get angry, they just said 'Wow, why does he go there and not come to my school?' “I told him my love, your dad likes being in Spain.”
