The 'mani' that I did not go to

Bulimic lost in the face of the oversupply of optional feminisms to subscribe to in this 8-M, I thought it appropriate to submit myself –out of pure road responsibility, and for not throwing myself into the streets without rhyme or reason– to one of those tests that run on the internet and that They measure your feminist spirit in blood for free.

Thomas Osborne
Thomas Osborne
08 March 2023 Wednesday 16:33
28 Reads
The 'mani' that I did not go to

Bulimic lost in the face of the oversupply of optional feminisms to subscribe to in this 8-M, I thought it appropriate to submit myself –out of pure road responsibility, and for not throwing myself into the streets without rhyme or reason– to one of those tests that run on the internet and that They measure your feminist spirit in blood for free.

The questionnaire airs fast. And in a second the results come out without any specialist willing to interpret them. To begin with, I see that I am short of "traditionalism", but, as with bad cholesterol, it is not a matter of feeding it either. The graph shoots up, beware, in “Marxist feminism”, the one that, according to the test itself, intends to “overthrow capitalism”. Oh really? Well, he will have deduced it from my abolitionist conviction of prostitution, which is still paradoxical, since it is from a Marxist point of view that some leftists defend legalizing the "oldest profession in the world".

That well-worn concept of “radical feminism” also comes out high to me. That could be because I distinguish between sex and gender. Added to the fact of seeing prostitution as a form of oppression and also being in favor of having women for positions of power, categorizes me in this limbo to which the ministerial portfolio of the only yes is yes has sent those who do not receive communion at his queer altar.

But wait, the thing does not end here. My "liberal feminism" is not far behind, nor is "cultural feminism", even though one and the other almost cancel each other out, since the first would correspond to what two decades ago we called equality feminism, and the second would be militaristic. in the opposite direction: that of difference. In other words, according to the test, I am as much in favor of seeking equality through policies that avoid the marginalization of women -since I consider them as full-fledged individuals as men-, as I am in favor of invoking the values ​​of the so-called female universe... What could have happened?

Will it have made a mess by verifying that I do not believe in a special gift of women for care, but neither in alienating them from their uterus to satisfy the reproductive desires of third parties? As you can imagine, choosing mani was very difficult.