the COURT OF FREDERIKSBERG: Video-surveillance and the telemast-information seems to be the prosecution's main material, in the case of the killing of the former gang leader, Nedim Yasar.
It has emerged at today's hearing, where the prosecutor, Jens Andersen, has presented the case, where the two men on 25 and 26 are to be charged. both refuse to commit.
The defendants are both ethnic Danish. The one has smooth tilbagestrøget hair, while the other has the beard and halvlangt, curly hair, and is wearing a light sweater.
See also: Why should Nedim Yasar die?: Today begins the trial
Nedim Yasar was at the time of the crime as co-host of the radio program Politiradio at Radio24Syv, and 19. november, he attended a reception for the book 'Roots' which is about his past as a criminal on the Copenhagen Perform.
During the submission the prosecutor has presented the case:
19. november at 19.38 concluded that the notification that had been shot at Hejrevej.
- Since it came up, found a person sitting in a car. The person was hit, shot in the head.
- That was tried first aid, but his life was not to save. The day after he departed by death at the hospital, explained the prosecutor.
He then described how a witness the day after reported to the police, where he explained that he rode on the Hejrevej, and behind him heard a crash. When he turned, he saw a man shoot.
Video surveillance shows that there was a blue VW Passat running with a lygtefejl. The car stopped in a parking space a short distance from the scene of the crime, and the person left the car, explains the prosecutor.
A while later you see him come back and sit in the car, where he talked short with cahufføren.
Then he left the car again. Shortly after, he came running back to the car.
- After having compared the video-surveillance with the witnesses, then it is the police view that this man is the perpetrator, explained the prosecutor.
Combined, there is talk about a lapse of 17 minutes.
He did then explain that the blue VW Passat is indregistrereret in the one the accused's name. In conjunction with teleoplynsinger have concluded that the two defendants were at the crime scene that point in time.
MS has acknowledged that it is his car and that he was on that parking space. But he was there to buy pills. He does not remember who the other person is.
The other defendants, OF, do not remember what he did that night, because nothing happened much.