Daniel Sancho already knows the charges of which the Thai Prosecutor's Office formally accuses him after the death of Edwin Arrieta: premeditated murder, concealment of the body and theft and destruction of other people's documentation. For his part, the son of actor Rodolfo Sancho has denied being guilty of the premeditated murder and the theft of documentation, although he would have acknowledged the dismemberment of the body.
It is not trivial that the cook has pleaded not guilty, because that would mean that the defense believes that it has arguments for his acquittal or for a favorable sentence.
This has been stated by lawyer Marcos García Montes, who maintains that they have "testimonial, documentary, expert" evidence that proves that the line of defense they have proposed "is not utopia, but rather facts."
The lawyer has stressed that the mechanism of Arrieta's death must be determined, "if it is a homicide, a murder, a reckless homicide, or it is nothing.
In this sense, the program And Now Sonsoles explains that the Spaniard's defense would have a witness who can prove his innocence and who would help prove that the murder was not premeditated.
The lawyer has insisted on this line, who believes that the important thing is to "focus on the mechanism of death, how it occurs, and whether it is a homicide, a murder, a reckless homicide, or it is nothing, because there is a full defense ; and that's where we're working."
"Everything changes on August 21 when the Police say that there has been a fight, which excludes premeditation and we would already be involved in homicide. The Police themselves leak different videos saying that there was a fight. We will provide images because this man falls into a struggle towards a bathtub and almost fractured the occipital bone, which is the cause of death, so we are at most reckless homicide," he said.
